Sony Alpha 700 camera review by What Digital Camera magazine
Sony Alpha 700 digital camera review by What Digital Camera magazine www.whatdigitalcamera.com More camera reviews www.whatdigitalcamera.com
a1 Photo Tips |  | Sunnyman's Photoblog |
a1 Photo Tips | | Sunnyman's Photoblog |
Sony Alpha 700 digital camera review by What Digital Camera magazine www.whatdigitalcamera.com More camera reviews www.whatdigitalcamera.com
Copyright © 2008 A1Phototips.com - all rights reserved.
someguy6481 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
when the a800 or a750 does come out it I hope it solves the ISO issues the a700 had before the firmware V4 update and improves on them, a next generation of the Boinz processor is needed.
revowithin said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
i know a900 out, but too expensive for me. i expecting something like a700…cuz theres been rumor new one coming soon
kezamizogabi said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
alpha 900 was out ages ago.£1900 in uk):
revowithin said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
any idea when the newer alpha coming out ? a800 ? a750 ?
valsero25 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
so thanks i am going to convert it on website into my currency thanks for the information but do you if ican buy it from africa whee i am
addsf1 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
when i bought my D300 it cost me just short of £1200 just for the body but now they are around £750 to £900 used but a great tip would be to go to an Ebay shop for a new one you can get some real good deals from there
valsero25 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
guy if someone fhas a nikon D70S just tell me about the price new or after use one
valsero25 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
that d300 cost how much? you say it has live view ?
valsero25 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
how much do alpha 700 cost with the lens you us in the video it it 28–80mm i want to know fastly i really need a camera
valsero25 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
how much does that cost you boy with the lenses pleaze it’s important to me
thomasward00 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
Since the Version 4 firmware update for the A700, it more than matches the D300 in RAW performance, they do share the same sensor after all.
n40798 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
Thanks
shmeldrick said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
HEy n40798, I have an a100 and I find the super steady shot very good but the only downside is if you’re using a heavy lens there’s no in-viewfinder-I.S.
silentalexx said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
omfg!!! haha just hilarious
WhatDigitalCamera said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
Good choice. We did a group test of the D300, Alpha 700 and Olympus E3 recently (the Canon 40D is not in the same price bracket) and the D300 comfortably won, though they’re all excellent and have their own special qualities.
addsf1 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
I found this review very informative and thank you for posting it. I have been all over the place deciding what camera to buy the 40D, D300 or the Alfa 700. After watching yuor reviews on all three cameras i have decided to go with the D300 mainly down to 1)live view mode 2)the 51 point focus 3)the 12Mp 4)HDMI out need i go on. I can’t take anything away from the other two and think that it is down to the user to decide what is best for them! enjoy it what ever you get
licokao said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
I prefer in IS in the body. Every lens becomes IS and less expensive. Unless you’re a pro I don’t think you can tell the difference
n40798 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
Are there any down-sides about having the image stabilization in the camera instead of in the lense?
johnnyboy1997 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
anyone notice at 7:04 theres a book called “fetish girls”????:D
FieserBauer said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
got this pearl of a dslr! i just love love it!
u can get some excellent lenses for the sony/minolta mount!
* * * * * !
simpson30 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
Time to upgrade from my a100 to the a700 soon I think.
N0rdman said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
The Sony draws a lot of pedigree from its predecessor Konica Minolta and handles beautifully, best ergonomics in the market. Solid performance and remember; Sony and Konica Minolta all started making consumer products, not like Nikon that was originally into military optical instruments and later made third part lenses in 1935 for a company making copies of Leica cameras, that company was Canon. Go for Sony I say!
andyroo2540 said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
i was deciding between the cannon 40d or the alpha 700 and this review has assured me that the alpha 700 is the better choice
i’ll be getting the camera with the 162105 lens soon
Lord0fSteel said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
Yeah, grat advertisment - where is the critique?
golawola said
June 5 2009 @ 6:05 pm
The SSS was mentioned around halfway through.